University of Pennsylvania Supplemental Essays 2026-27, With Examples: Every Prompt, Including Wharton, Nursing, and Dual-Degree Programs

Before You Write: What Penn Is Looking For

Penn’s own admissions office is unusually direct about what these essays are for: they want to understand how you consider others, how you think about community, what motivates your academic aspirations, and what draws you to Penn specifically. Their own test for a strong answer: if someone who knows you read your short answer with your name removed, would they still know you wrote it? That’s a genuinely useful bar to write toward.

Essay 1: Thank-You Note

“Write a short thank-you note to someone you have not yet thanked and would like to acknowledge. (We encourage you to share this note with that person, if possible, and reflect on the experience!) (50-200 words)”

What to do:

• Pick someone specific and slightly unexpected, this works best when it’s not the obvious “thank you mom” answer.

• Actually write it as a note, in second person, addressed to them, not as an essay about them.

• Let the specificity of what they did carry the emotional weight, not adjectives.

What to avoid:

• Vague gratitude with no concrete moment behind it.

• Someone already covered elsewhere in your application (a recommender, a well-known mentor already named in your activities list).

• Turning it into a resume of their accomplishments instead of what they did for you specifically.

Example: Ms. Alvarez, you probably don’t remember handing me a battered copy of Braiding Sweetgrass during a free period sophomore year, saying only “this is one of my favorites, I think you’ll get it.” I almost didn’t start it. I’d never checked out a science book by choice before. Three chapters in, I was rereading passages out loud to my little brother, who didn’t care, and taking notes I didn’t need for any class. That book is the reason I started looking at environmental science as something I could actually study, not just worry about. You handed me one book off a cart of hundreds and somehow knew it was the one that would stick. I don’t think I ever told you it worked.

Essay 2: Community at Penn

“How will you explore community at Penn? Consider how Penn will help shape your perspective, and how your experiences and perspective will help shape Penn. (50-200 words)”

What to do:

• Answer both directions explicitly, what Penn gives you and what you give Penn, the prompt is structured that way on purpose.

• Name something specific, a group, a tradition, a physical space, not “the diverse student body.”

• Ground it in something real about how you already engage with community, not just what you hope to do someday.

What to avoid:

• One-directional answers that only cover what Penn offers you.

• Generic praise that could apply to any school with a “vibrant community.”

• Repeating your activities list instead of showing how you actually participate in groups.

Example: I’ve sung alto in my school choir since ninth grade, and rehearsal became less about the music and more about the two hours a day where I knew exactly where I belonged, four sections deep in a room that felt like home no matter what was happening outside of it. Choir taught me that the sound only works if everyone gives up a little bit of being heard individually, and that trade-off is what made it feel like family rather than an activity. I want to find that same home in Penn’s a cappella community, the same daily rehearsal rhythm, the same trust built from hours of blending voices until eight people sound like one. I’d bring four years of knowing exactly how that kind of belonging gets built, one rehearsal at a time.

School-Specific Essays

Considering the undergraduate school you’ve selected for your single-degree option, respond to your school-specific prompt below.

College of Arts and Sciences

“The College of Arts and Sciences is designed to foster discovery and connection. Describe something you are curious about—something you’d like to learn more about or find a new approach to—and how you might pursue that curiosity in the College. (50-200 words)”

What to do:

• Name one narrow curiosity, not a whole field.

• Show it’s active, not hypothetical, something you’re already chasing in some form.

• Point to something specific in the College, an interdisciplinary minor, a specific department’s approach, not just “I’ll take classes.”

What to avoid:

• A curiosity so broad it could belong to any applicant.

• Treating “discovery and connection” as a checkbox instead of actually connecting two things.

• No Penn-specific landing point at the end.

Example: I keep a running list of questions no one in my AP Psych class wants to touch, like why exposure therapy works on phobias but rarely on grief. That question sent me down a rabbit hole of behavioral neuroscience papers I only half understood, then into interviews with two family friends who are therapists, trying to find where the science and the lived experience disagree. The College’s flexibility between psychology, cognitive science, and philosophy is exactly where I want to keep chasing that gap, formally this time, instead of just texting therapists at midnight.

The Wharton School

“Wharton prepares its students to make an impact by applying business methods and economic theory to real-world problems, including economic, political, and social issues. Discuss a current issue of importance to you and how you hope a Wharton education would help you explore it. (50-200 words)”

What to do:

• Pick a real issue you already have a personal stake in or informed opinion on, not a headline you looked up.

• Name the specific economic or business lens you’d apply, not just “study business.”

• Tie back to Wharton’s own framing, business methods plus economic theory applied to real problems.

What to avoid:

• Picking an issue purely because it sounds impressive or timely.

• Treating this as a personal statement retread with “Wharton” appended at the end.

• Vague ambitions like “make a difference” with no analytical angle.

Example: My family’s corner store extends informal credit to regulars, no contracts, no interest, just a notebook of who’s good for it. Watching my parents absorb that risk taught me that credit access isn’t just a policy debate, it’s the difference between a family eating that week or not. I want to study how microfinance models scale that same trust-based lending into something structurally sound without losing what makes it work: the relationship. Wharton’s focus on applying real economic theory to real, unglamorous problems is where I want to test whether my parents’ notebook system actually holds up against the data.

The School of Engineering and Applied Science

“Penn Engineering prepares its students to become leaders in technology by combining a strong foundation in the natural sciences and mathematics with depth of study in focused disciplinary majors. Describe how you plan to pursue your engineering interests at Penn, particularly within the intended major you selected. (50-200 words)”

What to do:

• Name the specific major and why that one, not engineering broadly.

• Show real hands-on engagement already, a project, a competition, independent building.

• Reference something concrete in that major’s actual curriculum or research area at Penn.

What to avoid:

• Generic “I love building things” with no specific major logic.

• Listing Penn Engineering’s rankings or facilities instead of your own reasoning.

• Vague future goals disconnected from the major itself.

Example: Our robotics team’s gripper kept losing grip strength unevenly across its joints, and no amount of adjusting the CAD parameters explained why. I ended up learning traditional weaving techniques by hand to feel where a structure wants to buckle before a sensor confirms it, then rebuilt the gripper’s tendon routing around what I’d learned. That’s the kind of problem I want Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics to formalize for me, not just simulation, but the material intuition underneath it. Penn’s emphasis on a strong natural sciences foundation before narrowing into a discipline matches how I already work: hands first, theory to explain what my hands already found.

School of Nursing

“Penn Nursing intends to meet the health needs of society in a global and multicultural world by preparing its students to impact healthcare by advancing science. Why are you applying to Nursing, where do you see yourself professionally in the future, and how will you contribute to our mission of promoting equity in healthcare? (50-200 words)”

What to do:

• Answer all three parts explicitly, why nursing, future vision, equity contribution, this prompt is graded on completeness.

• Ground “why nursing” in a real experience, not an abstract calling.

• Make the equity piece specific, not a restatement of Penn’s own mission language back at them.

What to avoid:

• Answering only “why nursing” and treating the other two parts as optional.

• Equity language with no personal grounding behind it.

• A future vision so vague it could apply to any healthcare career.

Example: I spent a summer as an informal translator in a hospital’s night surgery unit, and what stayed with me wasn’t the procedures, it was watching a partially blind patient struggle through discharge paperwork built for people who could see fine. I redid her forms myself, but it took hours I won’t always have. I’m applying to Nursing because that gap, between what care requires and what systems actually provide, is where I want to work, not just at the bedside but in redesigning the systems around it. Long-term, I see myself in clinical practice with a research arm focused on accessible patient communication, work that Penn Nursing’s equity mission treats as core, not supplementary.

Specialized and Dual-Degree Programs

If applying to one of these programs, an additional essay (or essays) replaces the standard school-specific prompt above, on top of the two universal essays everyone answers.

Huntsman: International Studies and Business

Two essays required. Applicants first select one of 11 target languages.

Essay 1: “Describe your experience with the target language you selected. (50-200 words)”

What to do: show real, sustained engagement with the language, not just years studied. What to avoid: listing coursework with no actual use of the language.

Example: I’ve spent three years in Mandarin class and two summers actually needing it, working the register at my uncle’s restaurant where half our regulars order in Mandarin faster than I can keep up. Class taught me grammar; the register taught me that fluency is really about speed under pressure. I still can’t discuss economics fluently in Mandarin, and that gap is exactly what I want Huntsman to close.

Essay 2: “What draws you to a dual degree in international studies and business, and how would you use it to address a global issue where these domains intersect? (50-400 words)”

What to do: name a specific global issue that genuinely sits at the intersection, not a business issue with international flavor added on. What to avoid: treating “international” and “business” as two separate interests instead of one intersection.

Example: Remittances sent home by migrant workers move more money globally than most foreign aid budgets, yet the fees eaten by transfer companies disproportionately hit the poorest senders. That’s not purely an economics problem or purely a policy problem, it’s both at once, and it’s the kind of intersection Huntsman is built for. I want to study how transfer infrastructure differs by region and what policy or business-model shifts could close that fee gap without relying on aid.

LSM: Life Sciences & Management

“What questions, problems, or opportunities would you hope to explore through LSM... Focus on the ideas, values, or questions that draw you to this intersection, rather than how LSM might advance your career. (50-400 words)”

What to do: focus on the intersection itself, not a career plan. What to avoid: writing this as a pre-med or pre-business essay with LSM tacked on.

Example: Our school’s biotech club spent a semester designing a low-cost diagnostic tool, and the hardest part was never the science, it was deciding what “low-cost” actually meant once we learned how insurance reimbursement models shape what gets built at all. That’s the question I want LSM for: not just can we build something, but what management and market logic determines whether it ever reaches a patient.

M&T: Management & Technology

Essay 1: “Explain how you will use M&T to pursue problems requiring both engineering and business perspectives. (50-400 words)”

What to do: name a real problem that genuinely needs both lenses. What to avoid: treating engineering and business as parallel interests rather than one combined problem-solving approach.

Example: My robotics team built a strong product and then had no idea how to get it into the hands of the younger students it was designed for, we’d solved the engineering problem and completely ignored the distribution one. M&T is built for exactly that blind spot, where a good build and a good go-to-market plan have to be designed together, not sequentially.

Essay 2: “Describe something you created, designed, improved, or built. (50-200 words)”

What to do: pick one concrete thing, walk through the actual process. What to avoid: listing multiple projects instead of going deep on one.

Example: I redesigned my robotics team’s gripper after six weekends learning hand-weaving to understand why it kept losing tension unevenly. Rebuilding the tendon routing around what I’d learned by hand, not simulation, cut our failure rate in testing by more than half.

NHCM: Nursing and Healthcare Management

“Describe your interest in nursing and health care management, and how Penn’s coordinated dual-degree program... would help you meet your goals. (50-400 words)”

What to do: make this distinct from the standalone Nursing essay, focus on the management/policy layer specifically. What to avoid: repeating the Nursing essay’s clinical framing without adding the systems angle.

Example: Redoing discharge forms for one patient taught me the clinical fix; understanding why hospitals don’t already have accessible forms as standard practice is a management and policy failure, not a clinical one. NHCM is the only path that lets me work on both halves of that problem at once, instead of choosing between bedside care and the systems that shape it.

VIPER: Energy Research

Essay 1: “Which major combination(s) interest you most right now and why? (50-200 words)”

Example: Physics and Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, because the questions I keep circling, how energy storage materials degrade under real-world stress rather than lab conditions, live exactly between those two majors.

Essay 2: “Describe your interest in the VIPER program, including how past experiences have shaped that interest. (50-400 words)”

What to do: connect a real past experience to energy specifically, not general STEM interest. What to avoid: generic climate-concern framing with no personal specificity.

Example: A summer blackout during a heat wave left our block without power for two days while a wealthier neighborhood ten minutes away never lost service, and that gap between infrastructure investment and who actually gets protected is what pulled me toward energy science specifically, not sustainability as an abstraction, but the literal unevenness of who has power and who doesn’t.

VIC: Visual and Interactive Computing

“Discuss how your interests align with the Visual and Interactive Computing (VIC) program. (400-650 words, notably the longest of all Penn’s supplements)”

What to do: show genuine fluency in both the technical and design sides, since VIC explicitly wants both. What to avoid: leaning entirely into one side (pure coding or pure art) without showing the other.

Example opening: I spent a year building a small game where the actual gameplay mechanic came from a rendering bug I initially tried to fix, until I realized the “broken” light refraction was more interesting than what I’d originally designed. That’s the moment VIC’s whole premise clicked for me: the technical and the visual aren’t separate problems to solve in sequence, they’re the same problem.

Want Expert Feedback?

Want expert feedback on your Penn essays? Schedule a free consultation with Momentum College Prep.